|
The Unitarian
Universalist Service Committee applauds the decision of the U.S.
Supreme Court to prohibit the execution of juvenile offenders. The
Service Committee welcomed the landmark ruling as a significant step
in bringing the United States into line with international law and
human rights standards.
“Prior to the
ruling, the
United States
was the last remaining nation to legally condone the death penalty
for child offenders,” said UUSC President Charlie Clements. “The
decision removes this moral stigma and offers hope that we will
rejoin the international community as a leader in the protection of
the human rights of children.”
“The imposition of
the death penalty rests on morally unacceptable assumptions of
governmental authority and retribution, and untenable arguments
about its deterrent effect. We have long been committed to
abolishing capital punishment throughout the
United States
and the Supreme Court has taken another step toward that ultimate
goal.”
In a 5-4 decision
announced on March 1, the Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty
for anyone under 18 violates the constitutional protection against
“cruel and unusual punishment,” and that teenagers are too
emotionally immature to be held to the same standards of
accountability as adults. The court said a “national consensus” had
developed against executing juveniles and that international
sentiment was overwhelmingly against it.
“The Supreme Court
appropriately highlighted the isolation of the United States as the
only country that still gives official sanction to the juvenile
death penalty,” said Dr. Clements.
“This decision also
removes one of the last remaining obstacles to U.S.
ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the
Child. Unfortunately, our nation is out of step with the rest of the
world on this question as well. The convention, which specifically
prohibits the execution of juveniles, has been ratified by every
country except the United States and Somalia.”
The United States
has withheld ratifying the convention because of its ban on juvenile
executions and another provision prohibiting the use of children
under 18 as soldiers in armed conflict.
Posted
March 3, 2005 |